I'm sure we can all agree that Climate Change is happening. Like Donald Trump, it may not be as big of a problem as many so-called scientists and their government sponsors say. But if man is causing the world to self-destruct, what is the true cause?
But first, what are the major contributing fuels being used today to affect the CO2 levels in the environment; what is described as the major factor involved in global warming or climate change?
In years gone by, COAL was the primary culprit, yet today it is rarely used in most countries - except China, USA, Japan and India (which account for about 70 % of the total coal use in the world). Coal is used mainly for electricity production, but also manufacturing.
OIL. The main consumers of oil today are the USA, China, India, Japan and Russia, in that order. These five countries account for almost half of the worlds total oil consumption. And what is oil primarily used for? Gasoline for automobiles and diesel for trains, ships, etc. Heating is another use for oil, particularly in colder climates like Canada and Russia. Almost 70 % of all oil production is used for transportation and heating.
NATURAL GAS. The main consumers of natural gas are the USA, EU, Russia, Iran and China in that order. They account for over 50 % of the total world use of this commodity. Natural gas is primarily used as a source of energy for heating, cooking, and
electricity generation. It is also used as fuel for vehicles and as a
chemical feed-stock in the manufacture of plastics and other commercially
important organic chemicals.
Man uses other forms of energy that create CO2, but in negligible amounts, such as, nuclear, solar,chemical and thermal, etc. Unfortunately many of these energy forms have been minimized in favor of the big three, Coal, Oil and Natural Gas. Why, you might ask?
Good question. Coal was as the primary energy creation platform for many years, until oil was discovered and automobiles invented. Oil was found to be much cleaner to burn than coal and could be used more easily in a variety of situations. Not only could it be used to fire electrical plants, but could be used in automobiles, airplanes and large ships and boats, as well. However, coal is still used in many manufacturing plants and electrical plants for convenience and price. Natural gas, when discovered, was found to burn even cleaner than oil, and has even been adapted to some automobiles.
So why not use solar, electrical, or other power sources? There are some obvious reasons, like the advancement of technology has not caught up with these new sources of energy at a fast enough pace. Energy storage methods have not advanced far enough. But the underlying problem is that big oil companies DON'T want alternate energy sources to replace their monopoly on oil, coal and natural gas.
This goes to say that they will do almost anything to keep other energy providers out of the market that they control (very similar to large Pharmaceutical Companies quashing natural treatments so they can continue to monopolize the drug market). This, over the years, has involved buying patents of alternate energy sources and then filing them away for future use. This is so that they can keep control of the current market until the supply has been depleted, or alternately, so they remain in control of the time new energy sources created.
Now, all oil companies, coal companies and natural gas companies are not all owned by the same person(s), but if you dig deep enough, you will probably find some links. One obvious link would be their financial funding. All of the companies that control 99 % of the worlds energy consumption did not get where they are by themselves. They required money to expand their various businesses, and we all know that when someone lends you money, they usually want some kind of say or control in your business.
Where do these companies get their loans? Some come from governments, and some directly from their personal or business banks. Of course, we all know that governments borrow from banks too; so whoever is loaning all this money has control over, not only large corporations, but governments as well. Who are these bankers? Various famous names come to mind, but there are many, I am sure. Rothschild's, Rockefeller's, Wells Fargo, Chase, China, etc.
So how exactly is a carbon tax going to help fight climate change? Well, the answer is, it won't. With countries like Canada collecting a carbon tax, and allowing the government to absorb all of this new free cash into their bottomless pit systems, any positive results will be minuscule in nature at best. Although Canada ranks high in CO2 emissions per capita, in the overall world of emissions, it ranks the 8th highest. To put this into perspective, China produces 29.55 % of world CO2, USA 14.95 %, EU 9.57 %, etc.; and Canada contributes a whopping 1.58 %.
Shouldn't countries like China, USA, EU, Japan, India, Russia and Germany be the countries leading the way in collecting a carbon tax? They DO produce over half the worlds CO2 emissions. But truthfully, why should countries that have been forced to continue using non-renewable, environment contaminating, energy sources, be taxed in the first place. When the banks and large corporations have been allowed to destroy the earth by killing rain forests, polluting the air with oil refineries, stunting the growth of alternate energy supplies forcing dependence on their products, and showing no regard for anything or anyone but profits; why, should not, these people be held accountable for global warming?
Why is it always the working class citizen that has to pay for problems created the greedy? Why do the profiteers always get away with the destruction of the earth? When will someone hold them accountable, and not the innocent public? People, it is time to wake up. Don't take your anger for higher gasoline and natural gas prices out on innocent store owners, or private gasoline distributors; take your anger out on the real deplorable bastards that have forced you into this position.
If the true cause of the problem is not addressed, and the people that have forced us into this situation are not held accountable, climate change will continue down it's current path of destruction, out of control. These deplorables have no consideration for the earth, and even less for the people living on it. Hold them accountable, not your local grocery store.
Thursday, January 5, 2017
Saturday, December 24, 2016
Racism - it is an illusion of the real problem.
Racism, in most situations, is not indemic of an entire culture or race. I say this knowing that there has been genocide in various countries throughout the world, but it does not always involve racism, it is sometimes backed by religion.
I have met thousands of people from all different cultures over the past 65 years or so, and I can count the number of true racists that I have met on two fingers of my left hand. Yes, out of thousands, only two.
I can't go into the reasons why these two persons became racists, but my suspicion is that one was taught it by his parents and the other experienced a traumatic incident with another particular race, and this affected his judgement of all persons from that race.
However, I have met numerous people in my lifetime that use the word 'racist' as if it was a privilege, because they are not white. The first was a native Canadian that had been raped by her family when she was a child, and for some reason transferred all her hate onto the white man.
Another, was a black woman, that believed that she should get everything she wanted, and it by any chance, a person of another culture or race got it, they were racists. Or the system was rigged against her particular race.
Another was an employee, that was the nicest person you would ever meet, when she applied and was interviewed for the position. She was sweet and completely competant during her first 6 months of work (the probationary period), and then she suddenly changed like a light bulb going out. She started sloughing off in her job, stirring up animosity with her fellow employees, and pushing for an advantage for advancement. When it finally reached the point of a grievance being filed, the racist word was flung in my face.
I could go on, but you get the picture. It seems that people from minorities (and not in all cases) use the 'race' word as a last resort for trying to get something they want and didn't receive, or as a defense for their own inadequacy. Whether it being indoctrinated into them by parents or friends, or just learned through their own experiences, the result is the same - they try to get others to follow their lead and become as racist as they are.
Now this is not to say that it is only races other than white people that use the word racist as their last option. I would assume that if a minority of white people living in a predominantly black/asian/other country didn't get their way, they could just as easily use the 'racist' word against their dominating culture.
My final point, as always, Islam. I find that Islam is the worst of the worst in the racism race. They have been taught, and continue to teach their children, that women are second class, just above Jews and Infidels (anyone that doesn't follow their faith), that gays should be thrown off roofs, that bad women should be stoned to death; and that everyone else that doesn't follow their corrupt religion, should be beheaded. Not only that, it is a religion that once you enter, death is the only option if you want to leave.
It is the most racist of all religions, and it has affected numerous Middle Eastern cultures and wants to spread to the entire earth. Amazingly, the West appears to accept their racism with open arms. How ridiculous is that?
I have met thousands of people from all different cultures over the past 65 years or so, and I can count the number of true racists that I have met on two fingers of my left hand. Yes, out of thousands, only two.
I can't go into the reasons why these two persons became racists, but my suspicion is that one was taught it by his parents and the other experienced a traumatic incident with another particular race, and this affected his judgement of all persons from that race.
However, I have met numerous people in my lifetime that use the word 'racist' as if it was a privilege, because they are not white. The first was a native Canadian that had been raped by her family when she was a child, and for some reason transferred all her hate onto the white man.
Another, was a black woman, that believed that she should get everything she wanted, and it by any chance, a person of another culture or race got it, they were racists. Or the system was rigged against her particular race.
Another was an employee, that was the nicest person you would ever meet, when she applied and was interviewed for the position. She was sweet and completely competant during her first 6 months of work (the probationary period), and then she suddenly changed like a light bulb going out. She started sloughing off in her job, stirring up animosity with her fellow employees, and pushing for an advantage for advancement. When it finally reached the point of a grievance being filed, the racist word was flung in my face.
I could go on, but you get the picture. It seems that people from minorities (and not in all cases) use the 'race' word as a last resort for trying to get something they want and didn't receive, or as a defense for their own inadequacy. Whether it being indoctrinated into them by parents or friends, or just learned through their own experiences, the result is the same - they try to get others to follow their lead and become as racist as they are.
Now this is not to say that it is only races other than white people that use the word racist as their last option. I would assume that if a minority of white people living in a predominantly black/asian/other country didn't get their way, they could just as easily use the 'racist' word against their dominating culture.
My final point, as always, Islam. I find that Islam is the worst of the worst in the racism race. They have been taught, and continue to teach their children, that women are second class, just above Jews and Infidels (anyone that doesn't follow their faith), that gays should be thrown off roofs, that bad women should be stoned to death; and that everyone else that doesn't follow their corrupt religion, should be beheaded. Not only that, it is a religion that once you enter, death is the only option if you want to leave.
It is the most racist of all religions, and it has affected numerous Middle Eastern cultures and wants to spread to the entire earth. Amazingly, the West appears to accept their racism with open arms. How ridiculous is that?
Friday, December 2, 2016
Justin Trudeau the first year..
Here are the most important Election Promises (made to almost every minority group imaginable). Let's face it, he got elected because women thought he was handsome, pot smokers thought he would legalize pot, his name was Trudeau, he liked gays and Muslims and aboriginals and transvestites and lesbians and women and men and little children, and especially refugees that aren't really refugees. He's just an all around nice guy, and besides, Harper was too secretive.
PROMISES KEPT
— A cabinet with as many women as men. (All appointments based fairly on competence, not discrimination...hahaha)
— A 20.5 per cent income tax rate for Canadians earning between $45,282 and $90,563, down from 22 per cent. (Of course this will be completely eliminated after implementation of the Carbon Tax)
— A new 33 per cent tax bracket for those earning more than $200,000. (Wonder what it is)
— Create a new, more generous child benefit. (Almost negligible)
— Restore mandatory long form census. (Whoa, glad he accomplished this)
— Unmuzzle scientists. (Haven't really seen any results of this yet)
— Create an arm's length advisory board to recommend merit-based, non-partisan nominees for the Senate. (Seems like all new Senate appointments have been old cronies, just like the past)
— Ensure process of appointing Supreme Court justices is more transparent, inclusive and accountable to Canadians. Trudeau's only pick for the top court thus far, Malcolm Rowe, was one of five recommended by a new independent, non-partisan advisory board. The board's chair, one-time prime minister Kim Campbell, and Rowe are to appear separately to answer questions about the appointment from a Commons committee.
— Withdraw Canadian fighter jets from Syria and Iraq, beef up humanitarian aid and military support to train Iraqi ground forces. (And just what was this to accomplish anyway)
— Launch a national inquiry into missing and murdered indigenous women. (What about murdered women in general)
— Create a parliamentary oversight committee on national security operations (this is probably comprised of Muslim friends).
— The first phase ($11.9 billion over two years) of an additional $60 billion over 10 years in infrastructure spending (for other countries infrastructures, not Canada, but our grandchildren will be paying for this forever).
— Scrap income splitting for couples with children (great promise for idiots)
— Roll back to $5,500 the $10,000 annual limit on tax-free savings account contributions (whoa, this is a real help, and people voted for him because of this?)
— Restore the age of eligibility for old age security and guaranteed income supplement to 65 from 67 (ooops, but now let's change it back).
— Work with the provinces to enhance the Canada Pension Plan (work with Provinces, that's a joke, and they are now trying to decrease it not enhance it).
— Provide a refundable tax benefit of up to $150 to teachers who spend their own money on school supplies (what about other workers?)
— Invest $2.6 billion over four years for First Nations education, although it is now over five years.
— Restore funding cut by the Conservatives for the CBC (they should eliminate the CBC).
— Expand the youth summer jobs program.
— Reopen nine Veterans Affairs offices closed by the Conservatives (where?)
— Increase financial benefits for veterans whose careers are impacted by injury (I'm sure it is an adequate increase).
— Welcome 25,000 Syrian refugees to Canada, although it took several months longer than promised and only about 15,000 were government-assisted refugees; the rest were privately sponsored (that weren't actual refugees in need. Some had to be bribed to come).
— Increase funding for student grants by 50 per cent (how about writing off the interest on these loans altogether?)
— Create the prime minister's youth council. (with a bunch of SJW whiners probably)
— Reform employment insurance to reduce the wait time before claiming EI, cut the number of hours an individual must have worked to receive benefits.
— Repeal Conservative legislation that allowed the government to revoke the citizenship of dual citizens convicted of terrorism, treason or espionage (how stupid are these people?)
PROMISES BROKEN
— Run deficits of less than $10 billion in each of the first three years of the mandate, still reducing the debt-to-GDP ratio each year and balancing the books in the final year. The Liberals' inaugural budget projects deficits for at least five years, totalling $113 billion, including almost $30 billion this year alone. The government hopes to lower the debt-to-GDP ratio over the course of the mandate.
— The tax break for middle-income earners was to be "revenue neutral," paid for by hiking taxes on the wealthiest one per cent. In fact, it will cost the federal treasury $1.2 billion a year.
— Reduce the small business tax rate to nine per cent from 11 per cent.
— Maintain funding level for the Canadian Armed Forces. Government pushed back $3.7 billion for new equipment to 2020.
— Immediately scrap the planned $44-billion purchase of F-35 stealth fighter jets, launch open and transparent competition to replace the current CF-18 fighter jets and reallocate the savings to the navy.
— Immediately invest $3 billion over four years to improve home care. This promise is now tied to negotiations with the provinces and territories on a new health accord which the government hopes to have in place next year.
— Cap how much can be claimed through the stock option deduction on annual gains higher than $100,000.
— Trudeau's verbal promise to "restore" door-to-door home mail delivery. The government is committed only to stopping any further reduction in home delivery while it conducts a review of Canada Post's operations.
IN PROGRESS
— Replace Canada's first-past-the-post voting system by the next federal election. An all-party committee is to report by Dec. 1 on the best alternative but a consensus may yet prove impossible to find (whatever happens, you can bet it is the Liberal's favor - oops, people didn't go their way so they dropped it).
— Legalize marijuana. A task force is to report by Nov. 30 and the government is promising legislation next spring (said he can't do it without breaking treaties. Funny how other governments are able to do it, but at least he is cracking down on pot stores and sellers).
— Overhaul the Access to Information Act to make government open "by default." (Just ask The Rebel how this is going).
— Amend controversial anti-terrorism legislation passed by the previous Conservative government. The government has launched consultations and is in the process of creating a parliamentary oversight committee on national security. (what national security? and actually he has now introduced anti-Islamophobia legislation so Canadians can't even complain about the Muslim invasion)
— Renew commitment to peacekeeping. The government has announced it will commit up to 600 troops and 150 police officers to UN peacekeeping missions but has yet to decide where to deploy them (yeah, and they can't fire unless fired upon - sitting ducks, and let's donate to the UN so we can look wonderful in their eyes).
— Review of criminal justice reforms undertaken by the previous Conservative government.
— Ban partisan government advertising, appoint an advertising commissioner to police the ban. An advertising commissioner has not been appointed but, as an interim measure, the government has asked Advertising Standards Canada to conduct independent and public reviews of government ads and has asked the auditor general to evaluate the effectiveness of that mechanism. It is promising to eventually entrench in legislation third-party oversight of government ads.
STILL TO COME - DON'T HOLD YOUR BREATH
— Reform election laws: repeal controversial elements of the Fair Elections Act, restore the independence of elections watchdogs, create an independent commission to organize leaders' debates during campaigns, limit party spending between elections.
— Implement all 94 recommendations made by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission on the lingering effects of residential schools on indigenous peoples (glad they are good at looking at fixing the past rather than our future)
— Re-establish lifelong disability pensions for veterans (don't hold your breath, veterans are freezing in the streets while immigrants get free housing)
— Cover the cost of four years of post-secondary education for every vet (I don't think they know what a veteran is)
— Reform the operation of Parliament, including empowering backbenchers with more free votes, a weekly prime minister's question period, more open board of internal economy meetings and an end to omnibus bills (I think the anti-Islamophobia bill came from one of these morons).
— Create an office of counter-radicalization to deal with the phenomenon of home-grown extremists. (while changing laws against Canadians to create home-grown extremists).
DISPUTED
— Adhere to the principles of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which states that no law or project can proceed without the “free, prior and informed consent" of indigenous people impacted by them. Some aboriginal leaders believe that confers a veto over natural resource projects. The government, which recently approved the Site C hydro dam and Pacific NorthWest LNG terminal in B.C. over aboriginal objections, says it doesn't.
— Collaborate with premiers. Trudeau has met twice with first ministers to craft a national strategy on climate change and is scheduled to do so again before the end of the year. But he's also infuriated some premiers by unilaterally announcing that the federal government will impose a floor price on carbon pollution — $10 per tonne starting in 2018 rising to $50 per tonne by 2022 — on provinces and territories that don't do it on their own. (Trudeau is showing scorn for other Provinces except Quebec, just like daddy did).
He's further angered them by sticking with the previous Conservative government's unilateral decision to limit annual increases in health transfer payments to the provinces to no more than three per cent, ending the six per cent escalator that's been in place since 2004.
— Restore public trust in environmental assessments of resource-based projects. While it develops new rules, the government has established an interim process imposing more stringent environmental hurdles and consultations with indigenous peoples. But the National Energy Board's review of the controversial Energy East pipeline proposal has been stalled due to complaints about NEB members meeting privately with proponents of the project.
— Lift the two-per-cent cap on annual First Nations program funding. Indigenous Affairs Minister Carolyn Bennett insists the cap was lifted in the government's inaugural budget, which included a "historic" investment of $8.4 billion over five years for aboriginal education, water systems, family and child services and other programs. But some First Nations chiefs are suspicious that the cap won't actually be lifted for another year. (One good thing, he has eliminated chiefs/bands necessity to show where the billions are spent, thus ensuring band members starve and freeze, while the chiefs and their families can easily steal).
It appears that the only two things this government is good at. Spending tax dollars like they were throwing out the garbage, and showing the world how 'Entitled' his little political group thinks of themselves. Does this man actually hate Canada? It sure looks like it, when he is here and not vacationing with his buddies at Soros and other multi-millionaire NWO promoters.
Please feel free to comment or add/subtract as you wish.
PROMISES KEPT
— A cabinet with as many women as men. (All appointments based fairly on competence, not discrimination...hahaha)
— A 20.5 per cent income tax rate for Canadians earning between $45,282 and $90,563, down from 22 per cent. (Of course this will be completely eliminated after implementation of the Carbon Tax)
— A new 33 per cent tax bracket for those earning more than $200,000. (Wonder what it is)
— Create a new, more generous child benefit. (Almost negligible)
— Restore mandatory long form census. (Whoa, glad he accomplished this)
— Unmuzzle scientists. (Haven't really seen any results of this yet)
— Create an arm's length advisory board to recommend merit-based, non-partisan nominees for the Senate. (Seems like all new Senate appointments have been old cronies, just like the past)
— Ensure process of appointing Supreme Court justices is more transparent, inclusive and accountable to Canadians. Trudeau's only pick for the top court thus far, Malcolm Rowe, was one of five recommended by a new independent, non-partisan advisory board. The board's chair, one-time prime minister Kim Campbell, and Rowe are to appear separately to answer questions about the appointment from a Commons committee.
— Withdraw Canadian fighter jets from Syria and Iraq, beef up humanitarian aid and military support to train Iraqi ground forces. (And just what was this to accomplish anyway)
— Launch a national inquiry into missing and murdered indigenous women. (What about murdered women in general)
— Create a parliamentary oversight committee on national security operations (this is probably comprised of Muslim friends).
— The first phase ($11.9 billion over two years) of an additional $60 billion over 10 years in infrastructure spending (for other countries infrastructures, not Canada, but our grandchildren will be paying for this forever).
— Scrap income splitting for couples with children (great promise for idiots)
— Roll back to $5,500 the $10,000 annual limit on tax-free savings account contributions (whoa, this is a real help, and people voted for him because of this?)
— Restore the age of eligibility for old age security and guaranteed income supplement to 65 from 67 (ooops, but now let's change it back).
— Work with the provinces to enhance the Canada Pension Plan (work with Provinces, that's a joke, and they are now trying to decrease it not enhance it).
— Provide a refundable tax benefit of up to $150 to teachers who spend their own money on school supplies (what about other workers?)
— Invest $2.6 billion over four years for First Nations education, although it is now over five years.
— Restore funding cut by the Conservatives for the CBC (they should eliminate the CBC).
— Expand the youth summer jobs program.
— Reopen nine Veterans Affairs offices closed by the Conservatives (where?)
— Increase financial benefits for veterans whose careers are impacted by injury (I'm sure it is an adequate increase).
— Welcome 25,000 Syrian refugees to Canada, although it took several months longer than promised and only about 15,000 were government-assisted refugees; the rest were privately sponsored (that weren't actual refugees in need. Some had to be bribed to come).
— Increase funding for student grants by 50 per cent (how about writing off the interest on these loans altogether?)
— Create the prime minister's youth council. (with a bunch of SJW whiners probably)
— Reform employment insurance to reduce the wait time before claiming EI, cut the number of hours an individual must have worked to receive benefits.
— Repeal Conservative legislation that allowed the government to revoke the citizenship of dual citizens convicted of terrorism, treason or espionage (how stupid are these people?)
PROMISES BROKEN
— Run deficits of less than $10 billion in each of the first three years of the mandate, still reducing the debt-to-GDP ratio each year and balancing the books in the final year. The Liberals' inaugural budget projects deficits for at least five years, totalling $113 billion, including almost $30 billion this year alone. The government hopes to lower the debt-to-GDP ratio over the course of the mandate.
— The tax break for middle-income earners was to be "revenue neutral," paid for by hiking taxes on the wealthiest one per cent. In fact, it will cost the federal treasury $1.2 billion a year.
— Reduce the small business tax rate to nine per cent from 11 per cent.
— Maintain funding level for the Canadian Armed Forces. Government pushed back $3.7 billion for new equipment to 2020.
— Immediately scrap the planned $44-billion purchase of F-35 stealth fighter jets, launch open and transparent competition to replace the current CF-18 fighter jets and reallocate the savings to the navy.
— Immediately invest $3 billion over four years to improve home care. This promise is now tied to negotiations with the provinces and territories on a new health accord which the government hopes to have in place next year.
— Cap how much can be claimed through the stock option deduction on annual gains higher than $100,000.
— Trudeau's verbal promise to "restore" door-to-door home mail delivery. The government is committed only to stopping any further reduction in home delivery while it conducts a review of Canada Post's operations.
IN PROGRESS
— Replace Canada's first-past-the-post voting system by the next federal election. An all-party committee is to report by Dec. 1 on the best alternative but a consensus may yet prove impossible to find (whatever happens, you can bet it is the Liberal's favor - oops, people didn't go their way so they dropped it).
— Legalize marijuana. A task force is to report by Nov. 30 and the government is promising legislation next spring (said he can't do it without breaking treaties. Funny how other governments are able to do it, but at least he is cracking down on pot stores and sellers).
— Overhaul the Access to Information Act to make government open "by default." (Just ask The Rebel how this is going).
— Amend controversial anti-terrorism legislation passed by the previous Conservative government. The government has launched consultations and is in the process of creating a parliamentary oversight committee on national security. (what national security? and actually he has now introduced anti-Islamophobia legislation so Canadians can't even complain about the Muslim invasion)
— Renew commitment to peacekeeping. The government has announced it will commit up to 600 troops and 150 police officers to UN peacekeeping missions but has yet to decide where to deploy them (yeah, and they can't fire unless fired upon - sitting ducks, and let's donate to the UN so we can look wonderful in their eyes).
— Review of criminal justice reforms undertaken by the previous Conservative government.
— Ban partisan government advertising, appoint an advertising commissioner to police the ban. An advertising commissioner has not been appointed but, as an interim measure, the government has asked Advertising Standards Canada to conduct independent and public reviews of government ads and has asked the auditor general to evaluate the effectiveness of that mechanism. It is promising to eventually entrench in legislation third-party oversight of government ads.
STILL TO COME - DON'T HOLD YOUR BREATH
— Reform election laws: repeal controversial elements of the Fair Elections Act, restore the independence of elections watchdogs, create an independent commission to organize leaders' debates during campaigns, limit party spending between elections.
— Implement all 94 recommendations made by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission on the lingering effects of residential schools on indigenous peoples (glad they are good at looking at fixing the past rather than our future)
— Re-establish lifelong disability pensions for veterans (don't hold your breath, veterans are freezing in the streets while immigrants get free housing)
— Cover the cost of four years of post-secondary education for every vet (I don't think they know what a veteran is)
— Reform the operation of Parliament, including empowering backbenchers with more free votes, a weekly prime minister's question period, more open board of internal economy meetings and an end to omnibus bills (I think the anti-Islamophobia bill came from one of these morons).
— Create an office of counter-radicalization to deal with the phenomenon of home-grown extremists. (while changing laws against Canadians to create home-grown extremists).
DISPUTED
— Adhere to the principles of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which states that no law or project can proceed without the “free, prior and informed consent" of indigenous people impacted by them. Some aboriginal leaders believe that confers a veto over natural resource projects. The government, which recently approved the Site C hydro dam and Pacific NorthWest LNG terminal in B.C. over aboriginal objections, says it doesn't.
— Collaborate with premiers. Trudeau has met twice with first ministers to craft a national strategy on climate change and is scheduled to do so again before the end of the year. But he's also infuriated some premiers by unilaterally announcing that the federal government will impose a floor price on carbon pollution — $10 per tonne starting in 2018 rising to $50 per tonne by 2022 — on provinces and territories that don't do it on their own. (Trudeau is showing scorn for other Provinces except Quebec, just like daddy did).
He's further angered them by sticking with the previous Conservative government's unilateral decision to limit annual increases in health transfer payments to the provinces to no more than three per cent, ending the six per cent escalator that's been in place since 2004.
— Restore public trust in environmental assessments of resource-based projects. While it develops new rules, the government has established an interim process imposing more stringent environmental hurdles and consultations with indigenous peoples. But the National Energy Board's review of the controversial Energy East pipeline proposal has been stalled due to complaints about NEB members meeting privately with proponents of the project.
— Lift the two-per-cent cap on annual First Nations program funding. Indigenous Affairs Minister Carolyn Bennett insists the cap was lifted in the government's inaugural budget, which included a "historic" investment of $8.4 billion over five years for aboriginal education, water systems, family and child services and other programs. But some First Nations chiefs are suspicious that the cap won't actually be lifted for another year. (One good thing, he has eliminated chiefs/bands necessity to show where the billions are spent, thus ensuring band members starve and freeze, while the chiefs and their families can easily steal).
It appears that the only two things this government is good at. Spending tax dollars like they were throwing out the garbage, and showing the world how 'Entitled' his little political group thinks of themselves. Does this man actually hate Canada? It sure looks like it, when he is here and not vacationing with his buddies at Soros and other multi-millionaire NWO promoters.
Please feel free to comment or add/subtract as you wish.
So, if Mohammad talked to God, and God told him...
that it was OK to screw and marry children as long as they had sort of reached puberty (about 8 or 9 years old), does that make God a pedophile too? Or are there more than one God? One telling Muslims they can rape children, and one telling Christians that this is not acceptable. Or, are Muslims just the chosen people, and they get all the benefits above everyone else?
Or has the Christian Religion misled it's followers, and it actually is OK to rape children, they just forgot to tell us. If there are two Gods, why tell one religion one thing and another the opposite?
It is my opinion, as someone who believes them-self to be relatively good, I would go with the Christian option - that it is not OK to rape young children, because they are still too young to understand what is happening to them. What do you think?
Or has the Christian Religion misled it's followers, and it actually is OK to rape children, they just forgot to tell us. If there are two Gods, why tell one religion one thing and another the opposite?
It is my opinion, as someone who believes them-self to be relatively good, I would go with the Christian option - that it is not OK to rape young children, because they are still too young to understand what is happening to them. What do you think?
Friday, November 25, 2016
When the media portrays corruption as commonplace, we are in trouble
People have become so complacent when reading the news about corrupt politicians, bankers, and corporations. The news media does not show outrage, as it should, they at times even seem to revere these parasites.
The American Political System has seen a decade or two of corruption, and I was beginning to believe that people were so used to dealing with corruption, that they would elect it in again. That being said, we will have to wait and see if things will change, as promised.
In Canada, our sheep voted in the Liberals. It is my guess that they were tired of Harper not being forthright with the public. Although I'm not sure if he was blatantly corrupt, like most politicians, what we got WAS a completely corrupt government. Not only are they corrupt they are a bunch of racists, calling all those that disagree with their immigration policies racist. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
The Liberals follow the immigration laws when kicking out people that lied on their immigration papers, but continue to keep a minister that lied on her application. They have spent us into around 30 billion into debt this year alone, and tell us the budget will balance itself. Sure it will, if they succeed in taxing the Canadian people yet again with their Carbon Tax. All the while they fly around in their private jets, giving millions of our tax dollars away to foreign governments (some of them that support terrorism), while neglecting our needy at home.
All that is done about this treachery, is a few politicians stand up in the sand box and call them names. Our political system is like a bunch of spoiled brats playing in their Legislative Sand Box, collecting pay and benefits that they don't come close to earning. At the same time, this group of idiots is making laws for everyday hard-working Canadians, whereas, most of these entitled have not really worked a full day in their lives.
I see people in Europe starting to stand up to this decadent government system, people in the USA have finally spoken; now I am waiting for something truly marvelous to happen in Canada. I won't hold my breath. Meanwhile the CBC and other BS artists keep hiding the truth and covering up for those that have stooped to the lowest of morals (if they even know what they are).
The American Political System has seen a decade or two of corruption, and I was beginning to believe that people were so used to dealing with corruption, that they would elect it in again. That being said, we will have to wait and see if things will change, as promised.
In Canada, our sheep voted in the Liberals. It is my guess that they were tired of Harper not being forthright with the public. Although I'm not sure if he was blatantly corrupt, like most politicians, what we got WAS a completely corrupt government. Not only are they corrupt they are a bunch of racists, calling all those that disagree with their immigration policies racist. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
The Liberals follow the immigration laws when kicking out people that lied on their immigration papers, but continue to keep a minister that lied on her application. They have spent us into around 30 billion into debt this year alone, and tell us the budget will balance itself. Sure it will, if they succeed in taxing the Canadian people yet again with their Carbon Tax. All the while they fly around in their private jets, giving millions of our tax dollars away to foreign governments (some of them that support terrorism), while neglecting our needy at home.
All that is done about this treachery, is a few politicians stand up in the sand box and call them names. Our political system is like a bunch of spoiled brats playing in their Legislative Sand Box, collecting pay and benefits that they don't come close to earning. At the same time, this group of idiots is making laws for everyday hard-working Canadians, whereas, most of these entitled have not really worked a full day in their lives.
I see people in Europe starting to stand up to this decadent government system, people in the USA have finally spoken; now I am waiting for something truly marvelous to happen in Canada. I won't hold my breath. Meanwhile the CBC and other BS artists keep hiding the truth and covering up for those that have stooped to the lowest of morals (if they even know what they are).
Wednesday, November 9, 2016
What we've learned from the 2016 USA Presidential Election..
1. Our politicians can be bought. If you donate enough money to their political party headquarters, they will do and say exactly what you tell them to. Thus the conspiracy theory about politicians being solely the puppets of financial masters is true.
2. The news media is corrupt to the core. What can be done about this is a good question. Should we leave it up to the new President to deal with, or will these antiquated companies fail due to lack of customers, or be replaced by honest journalism on the internet? If the ownership or management of these conglomerates is changed, will that force them to become news providers again?
3. Some people are truly sheep when it comes to voting. They can support their party without question, even if it is obvious that they are corrupt to the core - including it's leadership. Sure, you can blame the corrupt news media for misleading them, but it comes down to one simple question. If it is obvious that Hillary has lied under oath and potentially committed treason, and that Donald said some bad things years ago and acts like a bull at times; even if both of these are true will I still vote for Hillary? If so, those particular Hillary votes should be attributed to insanity or just plain old blind stupidity.
4. In general, the entire democratic system (as we know it) does not work as well as it should. When the only people that run for leadership are rich, or rich and corrupt to the core, what does this say about hard-working Americans being able to run the country. You can be the most honest and giving person in the world, but under the present system (without financing) you can never become President.
5. The American people, and yes, even the world, is in for some future changes. Let's hope that Donald Trump's promises were sincere. If so, I hope the changes will be positive. Now, my last question, is will Hillary and her associates go to jail? Oh, and please don't send all your losers to Canada.
2. The news media is corrupt to the core. What can be done about this is a good question. Should we leave it up to the new President to deal with, or will these antiquated companies fail due to lack of customers, or be replaced by honest journalism on the internet? If the ownership or management of these conglomerates is changed, will that force them to become news providers again?
3. Some people are truly sheep when it comes to voting. They can support their party without question, even if it is obvious that they are corrupt to the core - including it's leadership. Sure, you can blame the corrupt news media for misleading them, but it comes down to one simple question. If it is obvious that Hillary has lied under oath and potentially committed treason, and that Donald said some bad things years ago and acts like a bull at times; even if both of these are true will I still vote for Hillary? If so, those particular Hillary votes should be attributed to insanity or just plain old blind stupidity.
4. In general, the entire democratic system (as we know it) does not work as well as it should. When the only people that run for leadership are rich, or rich and corrupt to the core, what does this say about hard-working Americans being able to run the country. You can be the most honest and giving person in the world, but under the present system (without financing) you can never become President.
5. The American people, and yes, even the world, is in for some future changes. Let's hope that Donald Trump's promises were sincere. If so, I hope the changes will be positive. Now, my last question, is will Hillary and her associates go to jail? Oh, and please don't send all your losers to Canada.
Tuesday, November 1, 2016
21st Century - What in hell is happening?
I've seen a few changes in my last 64 years on earth, but nothing like the first decade of the 21st Century. Some could describe it as the age of Insanity, but if you look at events closely, you'll see that there is a plan being implemented that is anything but insane, although extremely difficult to understand.
The world has always been fraught with wars. Wars over lands, wars over religions, wars over differences in opinions and cultures, and lately, wars over greed and power. All wars have one final outcome - people die, people gain power and yet others get rich. At the end of may of these wars, the winners and losers are written in history, but there appear to be others that have spawned these wars with other motives, that go hidden from sight.
Today, we see a new and insidious type of war being fought. There are no apparent battlegrounds, no apparent generals leading their soldiers, and no obvious outcome of the battle itself. Many of us do not even know who started the war or which side we should truly be on. Right and wrong have been blurred beyond the point of comprehension. Sure, we can see some of the battlefields, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.; but we can't see past the death and destruction to understand what is truly going on.
We have watched the USA and UN trying to control the oilfields of the world, and covertly try to topple governments that they perceive as anti-USA, and we can see countries like China and Russia trying to protect their sovereignty over their own populations, but with the recent influx of Islam into Europe and the West, we are completely perplexed as to why our governments are more intent on protecting our invaders than protecting their own citizens.
Religions that are part of the heritage of the West have been controlled and diminished to the point they are almost non-existent, and nationalism ridiculed; whereas Islam has been promoted and allowed to flourish in our schools and governing systems. While our liberties have been eroded over the past decade or so, we see more and more rights given to outside religions. Of course calling Islam a religion is sort of like calling our governments 'For the People'. Islam is more of a plague than a religion.
I see that the world has come down to basically two governing bodies. On one side you have the Islamic disease that controls most of the oil resources in the world. They use these vast revenues to control their own citizens and also to influence governments in non-Islamic societies. Although they only have about 1/4 of the worlds population under their control, their control over their own people is utterly complete.
They not only have control over their citizens minds, but also their religion and their government; complete control, from birth to the grave. Their people must accept Islam, forever, and follow everything told to them by their Imams, without fail. Otherwise they are cast out and killed. They cannot insult Islam, and are taught, from a very early age, just who is accepted and who should be killed.
l can understand why they are now infiltrating other non-Islamic societies because their ultimate objective is to convert everyone to their Islamic religion and control the entire earth with Sharia Law. What a perfect world it would be if everyone worshiped Allah 5 times a day, and displayed undying allegiance to their system. And perhaps it was the West's meddling in their culture that has led to their apparent push back.
What I can't understand for the life of me, is why our Western and European leaders are allowing a group of people that hate us (and ultimately would wish us all dead), to enter our countries and live among us without assimilating and showing utter contempt for us. Not only that, they mindfully pay them to live here. Even going so far as to allow them religions freedoms that no other religion is allowed, and we have numerous goody two-shoes liberals wanting to bring them in by the thousands/millions. Anyone that disagrees with them has 300-400 years of racism thrown in their faces to make them feel guilty about turning the bad ones away.
On the other side of the coin, we have us. Controlled by about 1% of the elites of the world, we live relatively free in countries that still allow a resemblance of free thinking. We can worship who/what we want, we are able to support our families, and live our lives in relative comfort. Our society allows us to speak our minds, to choose our own paths, and be whatever we want to be. Of course, we pay a price for our complacency.
Governments have become more corrupt, religious leaders have become lazy, and most people are so concerned with their lives that they don't see the big picture. Not only do the rich control the finances of our world, they control what we eat and what we are told by the news media. Our politicians no longer represent the people, but represent the interests of the elites and themselves.
I'm not sure if our governments are afraid of this new threat arriving on our shores, or if they have been paid to ignore it, and in many cases, to even support it. This leads to the question. Why are our governments allowing this threat to come into our countries and live next door to us? It is like mixing water and oil. Are they expecting civil war to erupt? If so, what is the objective? Or are the majority of Western leaders actually closet Muslims?
Of course, warmongers like Halliburton and others, make their money from wars, and I can clearly see why they would allow this situation. And of course, these companies have politicians in their pockets, just like other large corporations do; but if a civil war erupts, won't the population be destroyed, thus leading to less income for these instigators?
Maybe it is all just a big game, and the Rockefeller's and Rothschild's are laughing at the situation they have created. They are gleefully watching as the world destroys itself and the New World Order takes control. Maybe they are aliens in human form, and we are all just an experiment; with them creating a variety of conflicts to see what happens.
Anyway, whomever is creating this new world conflict, they are doing a great job of it. Political puppets are mixing two opposite cultures, disowning their own people, while allowing the new culture to force itself upon their citizens; and even going so far as to control the news media to hide ugly atrocities such as rape and murder. Western civilization is now operating under three sets of rules. One for the rich, one for the poor and another for the new immigrants. One system is difficult enough to manage, let alone three.
They are now allowing them to flaunt their noisy religion in the West's faces, while slowly creeping into their school system. One must admit, our government is ensuring this friction continues for generations to come - unless, of course, civil war erupts soon.
The next decade or two should be interesting, at best. What will be the outcome? If you have any insight into why this is happening, I'd love to hear your ideas.
The world has always been fraught with wars. Wars over lands, wars over religions, wars over differences in opinions and cultures, and lately, wars over greed and power. All wars have one final outcome - people die, people gain power and yet others get rich. At the end of may of these wars, the winners and losers are written in history, but there appear to be others that have spawned these wars with other motives, that go hidden from sight.
Today, we see a new and insidious type of war being fought. There are no apparent battlegrounds, no apparent generals leading their soldiers, and no obvious outcome of the battle itself. Many of us do not even know who started the war or which side we should truly be on. Right and wrong have been blurred beyond the point of comprehension. Sure, we can see some of the battlefields, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.; but we can't see past the death and destruction to understand what is truly going on.
We have watched the USA and UN trying to control the oilfields of the world, and covertly try to topple governments that they perceive as anti-USA, and we can see countries like China and Russia trying to protect their sovereignty over their own populations, but with the recent influx of Islam into Europe and the West, we are completely perplexed as to why our governments are more intent on protecting our invaders than protecting their own citizens.
Religions that are part of the heritage of the West have been controlled and diminished to the point they are almost non-existent, and nationalism ridiculed; whereas Islam has been promoted and allowed to flourish in our schools and governing systems. While our liberties have been eroded over the past decade or so, we see more and more rights given to outside religions. Of course calling Islam a religion is sort of like calling our governments 'For the People'. Islam is more of a plague than a religion.
I see that the world has come down to basically two governing bodies. On one side you have the Islamic disease that controls most of the oil resources in the world. They use these vast revenues to control their own citizens and also to influence governments in non-Islamic societies. Although they only have about 1/4 of the worlds population under their control, their control over their own people is utterly complete.
They not only have control over their citizens minds, but also their religion and their government; complete control, from birth to the grave. Their people must accept Islam, forever, and follow everything told to them by their Imams, without fail. Otherwise they are cast out and killed. They cannot insult Islam, and are taught, from a very early age, just who is accepted and who should be killed.
l can understand why they are now infiltrating other non-Islamic societies because their ultimate objective is to convert everyone to their Islamic religion and control the entire earth with Sharia Law. What a perfect world it would be if everyone worshiped Allah 5 times a day, and displayed undying allegiance to their system. And perhaps it was the West's meddling in their culture that has led to their apparent push back.
What I can't understand for the life of me, is why our Western and European leaders are allowing a group of people that hate us (and ultimately would wish us all dead), to enter our countries and live among us without assimilating and showing utter contempt for us. Not only that, they mindfully pay them to live here. Even going so far as to allow them religions freedoms that no other religion is allowed, and we have numerous goody two-shoes liberals wanting to bring them in by the thousands/millions. Anyone that disagrees with them has 300-400 years of racism thrown in their faces to make them feel guilty about turning the bad ones away.
On the other side of the coin, we have us. Controlled by about 1% of the elites of the world, we live relatively free in countries that still allow a resemblance of free thinking. We can worship who/what we want, we are able to support our families, and live our lives in relative comfort. Our society allows us to speak our minds, to choose our own paths, and be whatever we want to be. Of course, we pay a price for our complacency.
Governments have become more corrupt, religious leaders have become lazy, and most people are so concerned with their lives that they don't see the big picture. Not only do the rich control the finances of our world, they control what we eat and what we are told by the news media. Our politicians no longer represent the people, but represent the interests of the elites and themselves.
I'm not sure if our governments are afraid of this new threat arriving on our shores, or if they have been paid to ignore it, and in many cases, to even support it. This leads to the question. Why are our governments allowing this threat to come into our countries and live next door to us? It is like mixing water and oil. Are they expecting civil war to erupt? If so, what is the objective? Or are the majority of Western leaders actually closet Muslims?
Of course, warmongers like Halliburton and others, make their money from wars, and I can clearly see why they would allow this situation. And of course, these companies have politicians in their pockets, just like other large corporations do; but if a civil war erupts, won't the population be destroyed, thus leading to less income for these instigators?
Maybe it is all just a big game, and the Rockefeller's and Rothschild's are laughing at the situation they have created. They are gleefully watching as the world destroys itself and the New World Order takes control. Maybe they are aliens in human form, and we are all just an experiment; with them creating a variety of conflicts to see what happens.
Anyway, whomever is creating this new world conflict, they are doing a great job of it. Political puppets are mixing two opposite cultures, disowning their own people, while allowing the new culture to force itself upon their citizens; and even going so far as to control the news media to hide ugly atrocities such as rape and murder. Western civilization is now operating under three sets of rules. One for the rich, one for the poor and another for the new immigrants. One system is difficult enough to manage, let alone three.
They are now allowing them to flaunt their noisy religion in the West's faces, while slowly creeping into their school system. One must admit, our government is ensuring this friction continues for generations to come - unless, of course, civil war erupts soon.
The next decade or two should be interesting, at best. What will be the outcome? If you have any insight into why this is happening, I'd love to hear your ideas.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)